Skip to content

Conversation

@rsm-23
Copy link
Contributor

@rsm-23 rsm-23 commented Oct 5, 2023

This issue seems to be caused due to the fix provided in #45319 . I have added kind of a check but the implementation doesn't seem very clean to me. Would be open to any suggestions. TiA!

@rsm-23 rsm-23 requested a review from MarcoGorelli as a code owner October 5, 2023 11:07
@mroeschke mroeschke added the Datetime Datetime data dtype label Oct 5, 2023
@rsm-23
Copy link
Contributor Author

rsm-23 commented Oct 16, 2023

@MarcoGorelli can I please get a little help here? I am kind of stuck.

@MarcoGorelli
Copy link
Member

hey - looks like tests are failing - I'd suggest stepping through a debugger to figure out where things might be going wrong

@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the pull request, but it appears to have gone stale. If interested in continuing, please merge in the main branch, address any review comments and/or failing tests, and we can reopen.

@mroeschke mroeschke closed this Nov 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Datetime Datetime data dtype

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BUG: datetime parsing: error message indicating position of conflicting string is wrong for larger data

3 participants